Why we said no to selling our own EV charger hardware

Six months into building Volta, a venture capitalist asked us the question that made me realise we'd made the right call already. 'When are you launching your own chargers?' It was meant as encouragement. Instead, I found myself explaining why we'd decided to do something harder and, I think, smarter.

The temptation was real

Look at the EV market in 2023 and 2024. Charger hardware companies were raising serious money. The infrastructure angle felt defensible; the regulatory moat looked solid. We had the technical chops. We had early Volta users asking us, 'Why can't I just charge here through your app?' It would have felt natural to say yes, to own the whole stack.

But every time I sketched it out on a whiteboard, the same problem appeared. We'd be solving for ourselves, not for the driver. The moment we built our own chargers, we'd have incentive to push users toward those chargers. The whole point of Volta - showing the true total cost across forty-plus networks, letting drivers see parking fees and idle charges upfront - that only works if we're genuinely agnostic about which network they choose.

What we learned from drivers in the first three months

Before we even launched properly, I spent three weeks sitting in coffee shops with EV drivers. I asked them one question: 'What makes you choose one charger over another?' The answer wasn't 'the charger brand' or 'the network operator'. It was chaos. They were using five different apps. They didn't know if that Tesla Supercharger had a £2 idle fee or a £6 one. They'd show up at a charger only to find it broken or reserved. One driver, Sarah, told me she'd wasted forty minutes of her week just figuring out the real cost of charging at three different locations.

That conversation shaped the entire product. We built the map view first. Then the true total cost breakdown. Then journey planning so you can see which chargers are on your route and what they'll actually cost before you drive there. When you're solving for that problem, you don't need to own the hardware. You need to integrate across all the hardware that exists.

The community charger angle changed everything

What surprised us was the homeowners. We launched the community charging marketplace almost as an afterthought - a way for people with a driveway charger to earn a bit back on their investment. Within the first month, we had three hundred people sign up wanting to host chargers. One was a hotel in Bristol. Another was a leisure centre with twelve parking bays.

The moment we realised we had this network of private hosts, the hardware question answered itself. We didn't need to build chargers. They already owned them. They just needed a way to monetise them and to appear on a map where EV drivers could find them, see the real cost, and arrive confident they'd booked a spot. We became the layer that connects supply and demand.

If we'd built our own chargers, we'd have cannibalised that marketplace. A homeowner with a 7kW charger can't compete with our hypothetical Volta-branded 22kW unit. We'd have killed the thing that makes the product genuinely useful.

The real value is in seeing the whole picture

Fleet managers get this immediately. One of our beta users, a rideshare company running eighty vehicles, told me that what sold them on Volta wasn't charger speed or availability in isolation. It was that they could see their entire charging costs across the network in one place, set policy controls so drivers couldn't charge during peak pricing, and export everything for cost-centre reporting. They were managing a charging problem, not a hardware problem.

When you're solving that problem, you're solving for integration, not manufacture. You're building the visibility layer. You're making the fragmented ecosystem coherent. That's what you can't do if you own hardware. You can't be impartial.

What we do instead

We've focused on the layers that matter. The map that aggregates forty-plus networks. The true total cost calculation that includes parking, idle fees, taxes, and per-kWh rates so you actually know what you're paying before you arrive. Route planning so your journey planner knows where the chargers are and what they cost. Accessibility filters so drivers needing accessible bays can find them. Receipt history and expense export for people who need it for work. The arrival check-in that confirms you've actually got a spot reserved.

For fleet managers, we've built consolidated billing across networks, policy controls, and cost-centre reporting. For private charger hosts, we've built the marketplace that lets them monetise their driveway. For daily drivers, we've built the thing Sarah needed: clarity.

None of that requires us to own hardware. All of it requires us to stay neutral across the networks we aggregate.

The harder road was the right one

Saying no to hardware was saying yes to something less obvious but more powerful: being the bridge between fragmented supply and confused demand. It meant accepting that our value isn't in building chargers. It's in making sense of the four hundred thousand that already exist across the UK.

That venture capitalist never asked again. But plenty of drivers have told us the app made them switch from petrol quicker because they finally understood what EV charging would actually cost them. That's the business we're in.

If you've built something in the EV space and faced the same question about owning the hardware versus integrating across it, I'd be curious what you chose and why. The tension between owning supply and serving all of it is the fundamental question most infrastructure software companies get wrong.

Ready to try Volta by MRVL?

One tap to download. No sign-up wall.

Get it on the App Store

Want to try Volta?

Visit Volta →